CAF: Working With Call Legs

Introduction

The main mechanism through which the customer application controls the Toolpack system, is via the management of call legs. The application creates a call leg (or more than one for conferencing and bridging) at the beginning of call, then control it through a simple, protocol-agnostic API. When a call is terminated, the call leg can be destroyed.

An instance of the class CTBCMCCallLeg represents a combination of one full-duplex media resource and its associated signalling entity. Typical examples would be an SS7 ISUP call with its associated CIC (mapped to a TDM interface such as a T1 timeslot) or a SIP call with its associated Voip codec resource (attached to an IP/UDP endpoint). This class allows a programmer to easily act upon the call leg to influence the signaling portion (e.g. accept, answer, terminate, etc) and to use the media portion as well (e.g play prompts, record voice, play or collect digits and tones).

Other member functions are available to retrieve (and change in some cases) the call leg attributes including the media profile (e.g. parameters to the media resource) or signaling information (e.g. protocol type, called and calling party numbers, etc). Joining/unjoining (connection/disconnection) of call legs is also a typical action handled by this class for ’gateway-type’ applications. It is important to note that this class is protocol-agnostic and can handle any type of supported call legs (e.g. SIP/Voip, ISDN, SS7, Media only, etc).

Caveats

• Do not confuse a call leg with a call . A call leg represents one full-duplex link to a party while a call represents

the agglomeration of multiple (two or more) call legs. For example, a bridge is a form of call that uses two call legs.

• Do not confuse the base class CTBCMCCallLeg with the class CTBCAFCallLeg. The later is a class used by

the ITBCAFCall interface when dealing with multiple legs. It is designed to represent a leg within a call. It cannot be instanciated as a standalone object with modifications to make it independent from the ITBCAFCall interface.

• If the overall goal is to bridge two or more call legs together, then the programmer would be advised to use the

CTBCAFBridge class instead. This class already deals with the issues of handling multiple legs simulteanously.

• The call leg attribute is an object containing the call leg information (called/calling numbers, etc) that needs

to be allocated by the caller (in this example the ’main’) and given to the call leg object. It will be freed automatically when the leg is destroyed.

• The base class does not automatically free itself. This is why the member function OnCallTerminated() was

overloaded to actually instruct the base class to start the freeing operation once the signaling call is done. In CMC User’s Guide another type of application, some steps could be required before the actual leg free is desired (such as logging, DB access, etc).

• The ’delete’ operation on the call leg is eventually done by the object exposing the ’freeListener’ interface. This

allows the application to centralize (if required) the ownership of objects to a single entity. This means that an object could also self-delete if it is given its own ’freeListener’ interface pointer. This all depends on the hierarchy of object owership the application designer wants to do.